​Is Israel Proscribed to Annex Judea and Samaria?

Avi ohayon. NPC

Is the next Israeli government indeed tied and unable to promote the application of sovereignty in Judea and Samaria because of commitments that may have been made by Netanyahu as part of the Abraham agreements?

12-03-2021

This claim, which is heard mainly from senior members of The New Hope party, is dismissed by the former Israeli ambassador in Washington, Yoram Ettinger, based on both the characteristics of democratic regimes and Israel-US relations in the past.

Here below is Yoram Ettinger's article that was published yesterday  on his site, the Ettinger report:

It has been suggested that the next Prime Minister of Israel will be proscribed from annexing parts of Judea and Samaria – for the next three years - due to Prime Minister Netanyahu's personal commitment to President Trump to refrain from annexation.  This ostensible commitment was never ratified by Israel's Legislature. 
 
Does a personal commitment by an Israeli prime minister to a US president tie the hands of succeeding Israeli prime ministers? 
 
Not according to the tradition of democratic societies, which aims to avoid Executive tyranny, limiting the power of presidents and prime ministers through a system of checks and balance. 
For example, international accords reached by US presidents require ratification by two thirds of the Senate.  Therefore, in 2018, President Trump was able to withdraw from the 2015 Iran Nuclear Accord (JCPOA), since it was never ratified by the Senate.  Moreover, the US is not committed to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, which was signed in 1999 by President Clinton, but has yet to be ratified by the Senate. 
 
Furthermore, the 1975 assurance of President Ford to Israel's Prime Minister Rabin "to give great weight to Israel's position that any peace agreement with Syria must be predicated on Israel remaining on the Golan Heights," did not commit any of the succeeding presidents, since it was not ratified by the Senate. A similar fate met President Eisenhower's 1957 non-ratified assurance issued to Israel's Prime Minister Eshkol, which implied US willingness to deploy its military in the face of Egyptian violations of agreements in the Red Sea and the Sinai Peninsula (which triggered the 1967 War). 
 
On June 19, 1967, in the aftermath of the Six Day War, Israel's Prime Minister Eshkol and his Cabinet offered "to conclude peace agreements with Egypt and Syria, based on the pre-1967 lines with due consideration to Israel's security requirements." Egypt and Syria rebuffed Israel's unprecedented lavish offer. However, this generous Israeli proposal did not preclude Israeli Prime Minister Begin – who was a member of the 1967 Cabinet - from applying Israeli law to the topographically and geographically overpowering Golan Heights in 1981.
 
Should future Israeli prime ministers be constrained by the equally-reckless proposals, submitted by four previous Israeli prime ministers, who offered a sweeping retreat from the Golan Heights? Do past Israeli careless peace proposals – which were rejected by Syria - carry more weight than Israeli law and Middle East reality, which has highlighted the erratic, unpredictable, violent and tenuous nature of the Middle East, in general, and Syria, in particular? 
 
In the 2000/2001 Camp David and Taba Summits, Prime Minister Ehud Barak – the shortest term-serving Israeli prime minister – overwhelmed President Clinton and Yasser Arafat by offering to withdraw from 97% of Judea and Samaria, re-divide Jerusalem, transfer some parts of pre-1967 Israel to the Palestinian Authority, and negotiate a return of some Palestinian refugees. That incredible offer – which would have returned Israel back to the pre-1967 nine to fifteen-mile sliver dominated by the mountains of Judea and Samaria - was rejected by the Palestinians.  
 
In 2008, Prime Minister Olmert's equally reckless peace proposal was rejected by Mahmoud Abbas.
 
Should future Israeli prime ministers sacrifice Israel's existential national security requirements – in the volcanic Middle East, which has yet to experience intra Arab peaceful coexistence - on the altar of past foolhardy non-ratified Israeli proposals? 
 
Rather than refraining from the annexation of the Jordan Valley and the mountain ridges of Judea and Samaria – which constitute Israel's most critical line of defense and the cradle of Jewish history, religion and culture - future Israeli prime ministers are advised to follow in the footsteps of Prime Minister Begin.   Prime Minister Begin applied Israeli law to the Golan Heights in 1981, despite his own support of the aforementioned 1967 peace proposal, and in defiance of brutal pressure from President Reagan, including the suspension of a promising defense cooperation agreement. Begin's defiance triggered short-term friction and acrimony with the US, but yielded long term appreciation for Israel's posture of deterrence and enhanced Israel's national security.

Comments
facebook comments
This site is run by volunteers, all donations accepted
Support for the idea of sovereignty
More Articles
All Articles >
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​And now, as the Middle East is being renewed…
Yehudit Katsover and Nadia Matar
24-06-2025
A new front has been added to the military one — the political diplomatic front — and on this front, we can no longer rely on miracles, even after having witnessed so many. The renewed Middle East now emerging must include Israeli sovereignty over Judea and Samaria and the rejection of the idea of a Palestinian state.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Blessings and Commitment: We Will Bring Sovereignty
20-06-2025
Ministers and public figures sent their greetings to the Youth for Sovereignty Conference held in Sderot. Watch the videos.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
The Victory Paradox
20-06-2025
Israel must translate its military victory into a historic political achievement that changes reality. Sovereignty is such an achievement.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Minister Eliyahu: Want Sovereignty? Roar It Out Loud
17-06-2025
Minister Eliyahu at the Sovereignty Youth Conference: Building on the Youth for Sovereignty as the hope and strength of the State of Israel.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Watch the Sovereignty Youth Movement Alumni Panel
17-06-2025
Alumni of the Sovereignty for Youth Movement and its former leaders gathered for a special panel on the meaning of being sovereignty ambassadors and ways for youth to influence major processes.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Sovereignty Legislation Closer Than It Appears
15-06-2025
The current coalition has led the way to the regularization of young communities and to an overwhelming vote against a Palestinian state. MK Rothman is convinced that sovereignty legislation is approaching.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Decisions are made in Jerusalem and not in Washington
15-06-2025
CEO of Yesha Council, Omer Rahamim: "Sovereignty can be applied in next week's government meeting. You just need to want it."
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​We Can No Longer Conduct Ourselves as We Did Before the Day of the Massacre
15-06-2025
In a moving and powerful speech, Shimon Elkabetz, who lost his daughter in the October 7th massacre, addressed the Sovereignty Youth and called not to forget what monsters we are facing.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Sovereignty: This Is How It Will Happen
15-06-2025
Knesset members Halevi and Illouz, leaders of the Sovereignty Lobby in the Knesset, in a joint interview on the stage of the Youth for Sovereignty Conference in Sderot.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
Karhi: Without Sovereignty There is no Jewish State and no Security
15-06-2025
​Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi: Sovereignty is the national spinal column, it stems from our people's history and constitutes a moral foundation that is also backed by international law.